About David

Like many artists in their youth, Moneypenny started his painting career, creating pretty pictures with traditional themes and techniques. At age 17, a defining trip to the National Gallery of Canada in Ottawa profoundly changed his direction. He went to see the Expressionists, but soon came upon the linear and often abstracted works of Carl Andre, Sol LeWitt and Jasper Johns. Here was art as an idea instead of the impressionistic depiction of reality.

Moneypenny began his foray into contemporary art thanks to a full scholarship to the Hartford Art School, University of Hartford, Connecticut. The art school Foundation Program led him to believe that art and design can coexist in functional sculpture. He continually develops innovative processes and methods of crafting sculptures to communicate experiences and observations on social issues.

His unconventional use of materials defines David Moneypenny’s art. Moneypenny’s art is driven by salvaged and found raw materials because they have a history, a prior life, or an event that changed their form. He explores and invents new uses for old materials: flags made from salvaged steel; tree bark and latex caulk; or screening, paint and metal fragments; or exquisite furniture sculpture made from crumpled automobile metal combined with repurposed wood. Bringing the rawness of nature into the polished world, Moneypenny takes a hard look at our relationship with nature and what we do with discarded materials. 

Robert Rauschenberg, and Jasper Johns, and the lyrics of Bob Dylan, influence Moneypenny’s art. They share an out-of-order perception of our world that creates tension. This tension appeals to Moneypenny, and his work often has an undercurrent of humor and edgy sarcastic wit. He believes the best part of an idea is the person who executes it and he uses the properties of the materials to deliver the idea.

Curriculum Vitae

Review by Patricia Rosoff
ART NEW ENGLAND
December/January 2006

DAVID MONEYPENNY

For David Moneypenny, meaning is about the generation of form; there is an insistent logic to his progressive build-up of it and a workmanlike delight in the processes of building a work of art. Still, within his spare, almost mathematical system there is an equally sensuous abandon when it comes to surface, and in his sculptures, light.

His artistic vocabulary is at once serious and playful, abstract and figurative, conceptual and physical—combining ciphers (circles, squares, and diagonals à la Leonardo da Vinci) with everyday materials and repeating motifs that he then buries and unburies in a variety of found and fabricated (but generally nonart) materials. He is as attentive to where you experience an object from (above, below, or at eye level) as he is to issues of scale (intimacy or monumentality).

Moneypennyʼs sense of process is a fascinating player in all of these images. He works from the center outward, burying and unburying the anchoring image of a five-pointed star in a drizzle of diaphanous surface decoration, creating a shimmering, pearly camouflage and building perforated forms in layers that freely march forward and back from the picture plane.

His approach is direct: He squeezes pigment directly from the tube, creating the welts of his cross-hatching; he never hides the underlying grid that supports the diagonal warp and woof of his drawing. He uses metallic paint (or graphite) to create a silvery sheen on his surfaces—denying the very surface he inscribes by rebounding the reflection of his mark-making right back at the viewer.

Ultimately, the end result is part da Vinci, part Sol LeWitt, part Jasper Johns, part Jackson Pollack—and none of the above. Visually intriguing, Moneypennyʼs work stands on a somewhat tentative ground between rationality and expressionism, restrained methodology and lavish sensuality

the Collections

Hard America

crashed
furniture

Assemblages/
Sculptures

paint